Detail
Raw data [ X ]
<section name="raw"> <SEQUENTIAL> <record key="001" att1="001" value="LIB909801605" att2="LIB909801605">001 LIB909801605</record> <field key="037" subkey="x">englisch</field> <field key="050" subkey="x">Forschungsbericht</field> <field key="076" subkey="">Ökonomie</field> <field key="079" subkey="y">http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/eco/es-34.pdf</field> <field key="079" subkey="z">Dehejia, Vivek H., International Trade and the Domestic Wage Structure (pdf)</field> <field key="079" subkey="y">http://ideas.repec.org/p/ihs/ihsesp/34.html</field> <field key="079" subkey="z">Institute for Advanced Studies. Economics Series; 34 (RePEc)</field> <field key="100" subkey="">Dehejia, Vivek H.</field> <field key="103" subkey="">The Norman Paterson School of International Affairs, Carleton University</field> <field key="331" subkey="">International Trade and the Domestic Wage Structure</field> <field key="335" subkey="">Alternative Explanations</field> <field key="403" subkey="">1. Ed.</field> <field key="410" subkey="">Wien</field> <field key="412" subkey="">Institut für Höhere Studien</field> <field key="425" subkey="">1996, September</field> <field key="433" subkey="">25 pp., 4 Figures</field> <field key="451" subkey="">Institut für Höhere Studien; Reihe Ökonomie; 34</field> <field key="451" subkey="h">Kunst, Robert M. (Ed.) ; Helmenstein, Christian (Ed.) ; Riedl, Arno (Ed.)</field> <field key="461" subkey="">Economics Series</field> <field key="544" subkey="">IHSES 34</field> <field key="700" subkey="">F10</field> <field key="700" subkey="">J31</field> <field key="720" subkey="">Wage Inequality Trade</field> <field key="720" subkey="">Skill-biased Technical Change</field> <field key="753" subkey="">Abstract: The paper considers the "trade and wages" debate, and proposes two alternative explanations to explain the rising wage</field> <field key="dif" subkey="f">erential (relative wage of the skilled vs. the unskilled), other than the conventional Stolper-Samuelson explanation. The</field> <field key="fir" subkey="s">t is an explanation dubbed "kaleidoscopic comparative advantage": the argument is that increased labour turnover might</field> <field key="dif" subkey="f">erentially impede the human capital accumulation of the unskilled as against the skilled, leading to an alternative</field> <field key="tra" subkey="d">e-based explanation. The second explanation is "capital-skill complementarity", drawing on the well-established empirical</field> <field key="reg" subkey="u">larity that capital and skill are complementary with each other vis-a-vis unskilled labour. The paper builds a dynamic model,</field> <field key="emb" subkey="e">dding this insight into a neoclassical adjustment model, and traces out the transitional dynamics and steady state.;</field> </SEQUENTIAL> </section> Servertime: 1.829 sec | Clienttime:
sec
|